Next Stage Progressive Christianity


You simply can’t make up “Christian” theological satire that stays ahead of reality.

Statements by Union Theological Seminary (New York, NY)

Union-Plants“Today in chapel, we confessed to plants,” the nation’s oldest independent seminary declared Tuesday on Twitter. “Together, we held our grief, joy, regret, hope, guilt and sorrow in prayer; offering them to the beings who sustain us but whose gift we too often fail to honor. What do you confess to the plants in your life?”  …

“We’ve had many questions about yesterday’s chapel” … “In worship, our community confessed the harm we’ve done to plants, speaking directly in repentance. This is a beautiful ritual.”  …

“We are in the throes of a climate emergency, a crisis created by humanity’s arrogance, our disregard for Creation” … “Far too often, we see the natural world only as resources to be extracted for our use, not divinely created in their own right—worthy of honor, thanks and care. We need to unlearn habits of sin and death. And part of that work must be building new bridges to the natural world. And that means creating new spiritual and intellectual frameworks by which we understand and relate to the plants and animals with whom we share the planet.”  …

“No one would have blinked if our chapel featured students apologizing to each other” … “What’s different (and the source of so much derision) is that we’re treating plants as fully created beings, divine Creation in its own right—not just something to be consumed. Because plants aren’t capable of verbal response, does that mean we shouldn’t engage with them? So, if you’re poking fun, we’d ask only that you also spend a couple moments asking: Do I treat plants and animals as divinely created beings?” …

“Union Theological Seminary is grounded in the Christian tradition, and at the same time deeply committed to inter-religious engagement. Union’s daily chapel is, by design, a place where people from all the wondrous faith traditions at Union can express their beliefs. And, given the incredible diversity of our community, that means worship looks different every day!”

The Good:

Affiliated with neighboring Columbia University in Upper Manhattan, Union became the nation’s first independent seminary in 1893 when it sundered from the Presbyterian Church …

Whew! Not Presbyterian!

The Bad:

Union Theological Seminary is very influential in Progressive Christianity, the theology that dominates the PCUSA’s leadership.

The Ugly:

Progressive theology ends up with a “Christless” Christianity regardless of if it is at an independent seminary of at the top leadership level of the PCUSA.


iBooks Publish Announcement: A Denomination’s Debacle

I have published my fourth eBook on iBooks.  If you have an iOS device then you can use this link to access.  If you do not use an iOS device, a PDF version can be found on my blog using this link.

Screen Shot 2019-08-14 at 5.59.24 AM

A Denomination’s Debacle

This book is an indictment of the leadership elite who have driven the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), or PCUSA, into an utter debacle.

The most visible aspect of this debacle is the unprecedented loss of membership and churches that occurred between 2011 and 2017. Over that time span the PCUSA experienced a net loss of 601,000 members and 1146 churches, which is almost 30% of its membership and almost 12% of its churches. But these numbers don’t capture the human cost in broken trust, lost faith and shattered relationships that has occurred behind the scenes.

What remains is a denomination dominated by a post-Christian elite who use their power to advance a social gospel that is virtually indistinguishable from the secular Progressive political project. To some readers this charge against the PCUSA leadership will seem to be not just extraordinary, but also unbelievable. This book contains the extraordinary evidence that justifies the charge.

Preface Excerpt

The reader may well ask why I feel compelled to tell this story. I do so for three reasons.

First, the elite denominational leadership has obtained this end under the cloak of purposeful deception. This deception is not found in their policy and theological positions. No, they have aggressively advanced their cause with general honesty. The deception is that they claim to have been doing so as a legitimate expression of orthodox Reformed Christianity. By so doing they have preyed with premeditation and malice upon the trust of the denomination’s parishioners. We will never recover from this spell unless the truth is exposed.

Second, there are still many faithful members and churches in the PCUSA. However, unless they fully understand the forces arrayed against them they will likely eventually succumb. Only if they understand that their presence in the denomination is as a light shining in the darkness can they be protected from the apostasy and heresy that surrounds them. That understanding is what sustained the Apostles and early Christians as they proclaimed the Gospel as isolated individuals and churches in the pagan Roman Empire. The challenge we face is far less extreme. Yet, if we prioritize the comfort and peace of our lives over our responsibilities as followers of Christ even the small courage required will elude us.

Finally, the forces that have corrupted the PCUSA act upon our general culture and thus are not unique to this denomination. Therefore, we can expect that other churches and denominations are struggling under the same theological onslaught as has laid the PCUSA low. Thus this book attempts to explain these forces and how a corrupt leadership can by deception and seduction smuggle false theology into an otherwise orthodox Christian fellowship.

Table of Contents


Page 1 of 3



Page 2 of 3



Page 3 of 3


The Passing Progressive Parade (3)


Only a small sample of the fraudulent “climate change will end the world in X years” predictions.

Endless Climate Hysteria Insanity Edition

Here’s a vignette that captures the insanity of the climate change true believers.

My family and I were visiting the Milwaukee Art Museum at least a decade ago.  We took an elevator and were joined by two employees of the museum.  One was speaking to the other in the most highbrow, pompous way imaginable about the certainty that the world was going to end if we didn’t do something soon about global warming.  The other employee listened in a posture of deep respect and concern.

It’s safe to say that the speaker wouldn’t know the scientific method if it hit him in the head.  It’s absolutely certain that he knew zero about the intricacies and problems associated with use of computer models to predict complex, chaotic physical phenomena.   But none of that prevented this man from presuming a position of intellectual and moral superiority on “climate change.”  He is my personal poster-child for all the know-it-alls who repeatedly go into hysterics over serially false predictions that “climate change will end the world in X years!”

Oh, I know, “97% of all scientists agree about climate change.”*  In the first place, this statement utterly contradicts the scientific method.  Science is not decided by vote, but rather by evidence and successful prediction of future events (more on this later).  In 1633 know-it-alls could have said “97% of all scientists believe that the earth is the center of the universe.”  In the early 1900s they could have said “97% of all scientists believe the the Newtonian theory of physics is completely accurate.”  Pardon me if I’m less than impressed.

Let’s now return to the issue of the predictive power of a scientific theory.  Here’s how one source describes this concept.

If a theory explains available data, then it should be able to predict what currently unavailable data should look like. … These responses suggest that, at any level in the scientific hierarchy, from a hypothesis to a fully formed theory, the ability to make testable predictions is absolutely essential to science. What constitutes a prediction, and how readily testable they are may vary from field to field, but this quality appears central.

So, I’m compelled to ask: “What is the track record of predictive power for climate science?”  The answer is “pathetically failed!”

And yet, so powerful is the social compulsion to belong to the in-group, so pleasurable is the experience of emotional posturing, that people cast off any semblance of critical thinking even after dozens of failed predictions over decades.

This is indeed the definition of insanity.  But, hey, if it feels good it must be a valid scientific theory!©**

* Note: This claim has been shown to be based on studies that use imprecise, even deceptive methodologies.  The percentage of scientists who believe in the catastrophic climate change theory is likely far lower than the 97% claimed.

** Copyright 1692, Salem Massachusetts.

Lemmings at the cliff

Yes, we must “fundamentally transform” our nation into a Socialist cesspool based on a fraudulent scientific theory to ensure that the planet survives!


The Passing Progressive Parade (2a)

Screen Shot 2019-07-14 at 4.50.07 AM

Not a Good Look, Wealthy Progressives!

In a recent post I satirically proposed that our wealthy Progressive betters “can convince the deplorable masses through leadership by example” on immigration policy.  Little did I know that a mere day later an article would be published titled “San Francisco: wealthy opponents of new shelter claim homeless are bad for environment.”  This article adds more proof (as if more were needed) that in this time of Progressive dominance reality is making satire obsolete.

I mean really, even the Babylon Bee couldn’t make this stuff up.  From the article in question (emphasis added):

The wealthy San Francisco residents who launched a crowdfunding campaign to block construction of a new homeless shelter in their waterfront neighborhood are employing a new tactic: arguing that homeless people are bad for the environment.

In a lawsuit filed against the city of San Francisco and the California State Lands Commission, the residents called for the project to undergo an environmental review before breaking ground.

“This project will have a significant effect on the environment due to these unusual circumstances, including by attracting additional homeless persons, open drug and alcohol use, crime, daily emergency calls, public urination and defecation, and other nuisances,” the lawsuit states.


San Francisco human poop map.

But, BUT, these are the exact conditions that residents of and visitors to San Francisco are forced to endure when they walk the streets of this previously beautiful city!  And, AND, the policies that have led to this appalling state are those demanded by the very same wealthy, virtue signaling people who are trying to keep their neighborhood free from these same conditions.

I guess leading by example isn’t in the cards.

Their position is: “Our superior virtue is proved by the extent of suffering that we are willing to impose on the less fortunate in pursuit of our utopia!”

The Passing Progressive Parade (2)


Time to Put Up on Illegal Immigration


I think that it’s time for our Progressive betters to put up or shut up about illegal immigration.  You’d have to be living in a cave to not notice the hectoring, highhanded, contemptuous onslaught of moral preening by Progressives on this issue.  There can no longer be any doubt that this elite and wealthy cohort supports a policy of “open borders.”

A majority of the Democrat Party base believes in open borders.

But Democrats’ response on the hot-button issue of immigrants being allowed to remain in the United States if they make it to the border was stunning. The pollster asked, “Do you think that people who make it across our border illegally should be allowed to stay in the country or sent home?”

… A staggering 53 percent of Democrats polled, however, believe that any immigrant that makes it to America’s borders should be allowed to stay.

The Democrat presidential candidates have also endorsed open borders.

There’s one clear policy takeaway from the second Democratic debate in Miami on Thursday night — the Democratic candidates are pushing for de facto open borders.

In a stunning moment, every single candidate on stage, including the leaders of the pack — former Vice President Joe Biden and Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders — raised their hands to signal their support for government-run health care that covers illegal immigrants.  …

Later in the debate, all but one of the candidates again raised their hands, this time to signal they would decriminalize border crossings.

What these developments mean are:

  1. The Democrat Party wants anyone of the 6+ billion people living outside of the United States to be able to enter without limit and without anyone knowing who they are;
  2. The U.S. taxpaying citizens will be obligated to provide free health care and other social services to this unlimited population of immigrants.

Top 25 wealthiest U.S. counties and how they voted in the 2016 Presidential election (Blue = D, Red = R).

Where exactly do these wealthy Progressives expect this uncontrolled mass of humanity to live?  Certainly not in their upscale, gated and protected communities!  No, these immigrants of unknown origins and intentions will be living in communities without the wealth and political muscle to keep newcomers out.  Thus it will be the less prosperous areas that suffer the school crowding, increased crime, health care system overload and culture shock of mass, uncontrolled immigration.

But there’s a problem.  These Progressive moral betters haven’t yet been able to convince a majority of the general public to support this policy.  This in spite of a decades long campaign to do so.  Clearly a new persuasion strategy is sorely needed.

The Wealthy Progressive’s Put Up Strategy

Let’s start with what is known for sure about the Progressive elite:

  • They are far wealthier than the typical U.S. citizen;
  • They are far more altruistic and generally moral (because they do endlessly say so themselves) than their fellow citizens;
  • Unlike their typical fellow citizens, they are not controlled by ignorant fear, but rather are the fearless vanguard of a utopian world order (because they do endlessly say so themselves).

Nancy Pelosi’s Napa Valley compound could accommodate hundreds of open borders immigrants.

Therefore, the Progressive elites can convince the deplorable masses through leadership by example, that being:

  • Since these wealthy individuals live in large homes with guest bedrooms and cottages, they commit to putting up signs that invite anyone who wishes to take up residence in their homes.
  • Commit to meeting all of the human needs (after all, these are human rights!) of every person who takes up residence in their home.
  • Commit to expanding community institutions and services to meet the needs of these welcomed guests (without limit and without cost to the immigrants).
Screen Shot 2019-07-05 at 5.27.01 AM

Look at all the unused space in the wealthiest county in the U.S., Loudoun County VA (near Washington D.C., of course).  Just think how many open borders immigrants could live there in utter harmony with its morally superior Progressive community!

By showing the unwilling how they have nothing to fear, how they have nothing to lose, how beautifully this all works out, our Progressive betters will shame us deplorables into accepting their open borders policy!  After all, don’t the elite Progressives endlessly say that the wealthy aren’t doing their “fair share?”  Here’s your opportunity to turn that propaganda statement into lived reality!

Don’t let us down you mighty moral betters!

The Passing Progressive Parade (1b)

Progressives Abandon Effort to Educate Trump Voters Out of Their Moronic Hatred, Now will Leverage it to Their Advantage (Part 2)

BERKELEY, June 28, 2019 -- by Mack Tool and Patricia Hack

This is Part 2 of a two-part series on the always brilliant Progressive movement’s strategic direction.

After great altruistic effort to educate Trump voters, the Progressive movement has made a radical strategic change in direction.  Multiple current and past members of the Progressive inner-sanctum (who wish to remain anonymous) have revealed this strategy exclusively to Morning Woke.

Having sorrowfully concluded that this voting block is indeed comprised of irredeemable hateful morons, the Progressive movement will from now on seek to hijack and then direct this hate to their political advantage.  The key insight is that, since these voters have virtually nothing but primitive brain-stem mental capability, they can be easily reprogrammed to serve Progressive goals.

The “Canuck Threat” (Phase 1)

Given that Trump voters are inherently xenophobic, the Progressive movement will reorient that hatred from the U.S./Mexican to the U.S./Canadian border.  Hollywood will subsequently begin cranking out movies and shows in which terroristic Canadian villains threaten all that we hold dear in the United States.  The Mainstream Media will simultaneously begin publishing stories about the “Canuck Hordes” that are massing just north of the U.S. border.  Google searches on “illegal immigration” will return links to the Canadian threat and the auto-fill feature will only include Canadian suggestions.  The dim-witted Trump voters in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin will see images such as the following plastered on bill-boards and mass media sites accompanied with terrifying commentary.


They started by dominating hockey, now they’ve conquered pro basketball, next they’ll invade our nation and destroy our way of life!

Images showing that the Mexican population is distributed in an unthreatening manner will also become prevalent in the mass media.


The nation of Mexico has moved its population far from the border to show that they have no intentions of illegally entering the U.S.!

Finally, an intense propaganda campaign will be launched that claims Trump has been lying to the American people about the real source of danger.


Why would Trump have lied to you about the Canuck Threat?  Because he’s a puppet under the mind control of Vladimir Putin!

By these means Trump voters will become convinced that the real threat is located in Canada and that Trump, as a traitorous Russian puppet, has been lying to them.

Progressive Heroes to the Rescue (Phase 2)

Having convinced Trump voters of the Canuck Threat, the Democrat Presidential Nominee (blessed be Agender/Androgyne/Androgynous/Bigender/Cis/Cis Female/Cis Male/Cis Man/Cis Woman/Cisgender/Cisgender Female/Cisgender Male/Cisgender Man/Cisgender Woman/Female to Male/FTM/Gender Fluid/Gender Nonconforming/Gender Questioning/Gender Variant/Genderqueer/Intersex/Male to Female/MTF/Neither/Neutrois/Non-binary/Other/Pangender/Trans/Trans Female/Trans Male/Trans Man/Trans Person/Trans Woman/Trans*/Trans* Female/Trans* Male/Trans* Man/Trans* Person/Trans* Woman/Transfeminine/Transgender/Transgender Female/Transgender Male/Transgender Man/Transgender Person/Transgender Woman/Transmasculine/Transsexual/Transsexual Female/Transsexual Male/Transsexual Man/Transsexual Person/Transsexual Woman/Two-spirit‘s name) will propose building a massive defensive wall on the U.S./Canada border.  After winning the election tens of billions of dollars will be allocated to this wall.

However, since the Canadian threat in nonexistent, the wall will be made from corrugated cardboard covered with polyurethane. Thus it will cost only 1% of the allocated money.  The other 99% will go to Socialist dominated trade unions who will contribute a large portion back to the Democrat Party.  Thus Trump will be defeated, his voters will become Progressive voters and the Democrat Party will be able to outspend Republicans at a 10:1 ratio in future elections.  By this means we will finally be able to bring the Socialist utopia into being!

Some might ask why we are publishing this strategy given that it might tip-off Trump voters.  However, we have concluded that they don’t have the curiosity to seek out non-neo-Nazi / white supremacist web sites or the intellectual capacity to understand should they stumble into this information.


Oh great and wise high-priestess of Progressivism, lead our vanguard of the superior on to the Socialist Green Promised Land!

The Passing Progressive Parade (1a)

Screen Shot 2019-06-23 at 8.21.01 AM.png

Question asked and answered…NO!

Progressives Abandon Effort to Educate Trump Voters Out of Their Moronic Hatred, Now will Leverage it to Their Advantage (Part 1)

BERKELEY, June 26, 2019 -- by Mack Tool and Patricia Hack

Leading Progressives have just completed a strategic directions conference in Berkeley California at which a major change in direction was debated and overwhelmingly ratified.  Although the official document is shrouded in the secrecy necessary to ensure maximum public transparency and participation, Morning Woke has obtained  reliable information on the content from current and former members of the Progressive movement who wish to remain anonymous.

Previous to this change Progressives had sought to influence voters who eventually became the Trump base by encouragement and education.  The first national politician to identify and constructively engage with this cohort was Barack Obama (blessed be His name) in the 2008 Presidential campaign.  After campaigning in Pennsylvania Senator Obama offered up these words of educational encouragement to a humility-filled Progressive audience in San Francisco.

And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.

Since Mr. Obama carried Pennsylvania, Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin in both the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections the Progressive movement’s leadership became convinced that these words of wisdom has sufficed to divert these needy loser communities from “bitter clingism.”

However, in the 2016 presidential election cycle the ever wise and perceptive Hillary Clinton (blessed be Her name) began to sense an almost imperceptible (to common folk) ripple in the political force.  Noting the previous success of President Obama’s strategy, she commented on this disturbance at a LGBT for Hillary Gala in New York City.

You know, just to be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic — you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people, now have 11 million. He tweets and retweets offensive, hateful, mean-spirited rhetoric. Now some of those folks, they are irredeemable. But thankfully they are not America.

To the utter shock and amazement of the Progressive movement, this kindly educational guidance turned out to be “casting pearls before swine.”  Rather than thanking Mrs. Clinton, these “irredeemable deplorables” in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin rose up as a “stiff necked people” voting against their moral and intellectual betters!

Rather than rethinking their engagement strategy (due to their kindly and humble nature), Progressives (and their Never-Trump fellow travelers) increased their educational efforts, summarized in the following excerpt from The Guardian.

Stories marveling at the stupidity of Trump voters are published nearly every day. Articles that accuse Trump’s followers of being bigots have appeared by the hundreds, if not the thousands. Conservatives have written them; liberals have written them; impartial professionals have written them. The headline of a recent Huffington Post column announced, bluntly, that “Trump Won Super Tuesday Because America is Racist.” A New York Times reporter proved that Trump’s followers were bigots by coordinating a map of Trump support with a map of racist Google searches. Everyone knows it: Trump’s followers’ passions are nothing more than the ignorant blurtings of the white American id, driven to madness by the presence of a black man in the White House. The Trump movement is a one-note phenomenon, a vast surge of race-hate. Its partisans are not only incomprehensible, they are not really worth comprehending.

More in sorrow than anger the Progressive movement has decided to abandon this strategy of positive educational engagement.  Since these people have shown themselves to be irredeemable a new and brilliant strategy of leveraging their moronic ignorance has been embraced.

This strategy will be revealed in Part 2.


Collusion 2.0!


CNN’s Brian Stelter confirmed the mainstream media’s new philosophy for covering the Trump Presidency by stating that “speculation actually has value, too.”

The Elites Strike Back

A professor rumored to be an acquaintance of former FBI Director James Comey has leaked documents to the Washington Post claiming that President Donald Trump’s administration has actually colluded with the Russians.  The documents contain information suggesting that the administration collaborated with the Russians to smuggle highly trained squirrels into the United States as a means of sabotage.  The squirrels in question are trained in secret Russian laboratories to chew through power lines, thus destroying the U.S. power grid that is used, among other things, to enable mainstream media operations.


Paul Krugman, hero of press freedom!

Paul Krugman, in a hard-hitting New York Times editorial thundered that “This is almost certainly another Trump Administration attack on freedom of the press.”  He went on to suggest that a gulag archipelago is likely being constructed in northern Alaska under Sarah Palin’s leadership to imprison “every American that doesn’t own a Bible and at least one gun.”

Anonymous sources with knowledge of this matter have informed the Post that these squirrels may be smuggled into the U.S. by Tea Party members.  The Washington Post’s investigation has uncovered that exactly 244,137 power outages were caused by these Russian trained saboteur squirrels in 2018 alone.  Sources also darkly suggest that in 2016 the squirrels were specifically targeted on the Clinton campaign and the DNC.


This time we’ll get him for sure!

CNN and MSNBC have picked up and run with this new accusation.  John Brennan, former Director of the CIA, appeared on the Rachel Maddow show, saying that, if true, these accusations prove that the President is “nothing short of treasonous.”  When asked to explain this statement Brennan responded by saying “I’m sure it hasn’t escaped your notice that Trump didn’t confront Putin about the squirrel issue at their joint press conference.”

James Clapper, the former-DNI said on CNN’s Reliable Sources that these new accusations are “pretty devastating.”  James Comey himself was quoted by the Post, “This accusation is just another example of how President Trump falls so completely short of the higher loyalty that has made me the unique arbiter of political morality and legitimacy.”


Adam Schiff says “Trust me!”

When reached for comment, Congressman Adam Schiff said, “Now that we have created an enlightened philosophy of justice based on the Brett Kavanaugh and Mueller Report presidents, it will be exceedingly difficult for President Trump to prove his innocence beyond a reasonable doubt.”  He also said, “I’m certain that information proving President Trump’s guilt will really come into my possession this time, trust me.”


Give me “my precious!”

Nancy Pelosi released a statement saying that she’s “reconsidering her opposition to impeachment” given the “seriousness of these new charges.”  Hillary Clinton released a press statement withdrawing her concession in the 2016 Presidential election and demanding that President Trump “hand over my precious immediately.”

President Trump Tweeted that this new accusation is “just a continuation of the political witch hunt by the fake-news media.”  Jake Tapper of CNN responded by saying this is “proof positive that the President is already obstructing what could become an official Special Prosecutor investigation.”


Acosta: “This time we have actual proof of a crime!”

When Sarah Sanders, the President’s Press Secretary, challenged the mainstream media’s unofficial spokesperson, Jim Acosta, by claiming that this was just another unfounded accusation he placed a box of 27 dead squirrels, some of which were still smoking, on the table.  Acosta delivered the coup de grace by saying in a voice that deplorables consider sanctimonious but elite media personnel recognize as conveying total moral authority: “This time we have actual proof of a crime!”

A Tutorial on “Wokeness” for Old White Men (3)


What’s this? It turns out that Titania McGrath (left) is really Andrew Doyle (right).  Or maybe to us newly woke it’s not that simple.

Putting My New Wokeness into Practice

Ok, so to you poor sleeping old white men out there the discovery that our woke guru isn’t actually:

“a radical intersectionalist poet committed to feminism, social justice, and armed peaceful protest. A regular on the live-slam poetry scene, Titania regularly performs at arts festivals, deconsecrated churches, and genderqueer spiritual retreats.”

but is rather:

the satirical invention of Andrew Doyle, a former Oxford postgraduate student

completely discredits “her” guidance.

But, now that I’m hip to woke I don’t see why anything should change.  After all, I can choose “my truth” to be that Andrew Doyle actually identifies as a woke gay white woman.  Therefore (s)he is no less a credible source for politically correct guidance than is anyone else!  After all, we all know that gender is just a social construct and that words have no fixed meaning.  So, what does it even mean that Andrew Doyle is a “man” or that he(?) meant Titania to be a “satirical invention?”  I choose to believe that Titania is just Andrew’s true self fighting to become free of all gender-normative, heterocentric, and racial constraints.  You go Titania!

And so, I hereby claim that I’m far more woke than the drowsy old rags who took exception to Titania’s brilliance:

The absolutely brilliant thing about Titania McGrath, as the world just discovered last month, is that she is really the satirical invention of Andrew Doyle, a former Oxford postgraduate student and clearly a very clever man. The Guardian, the New Statesman, and other woke publications don’t think so. “Lampooning the language of social justice is a cheap shot,” according to The Guardian. The New Statesman, now that Titania (Queen of the Fairies in A Midsummer Night’s Dream) has unmasked himself as Andrew, concludes that his performance is a “tired and unfunny ‘joke’ ” that is “just the old sneering at the young.”

Oh, that’s all so January 2019!  As Titania would say, “keep up!”

If we allow “facts,” “logic” and “word definitions” to hold us back then we’ll exclude Titania’s excellent guidance from the public sphere.  Hey, that wouldn’t be inclusive!

So, in parting, as I walk fully conscious into the 21st century utopia, I leave you with these final words of wisdom from my woke guru Titania.

“I despise whiteness. Literally nothing about me is white except for my skin colour.”

“You’ll notice there’s not a single obese player in the England football team. This kind of discrimination is precisely why the fat acceptance movement is so essential.”

“Wearing a maga hat is a form of incitement to violence. So if someone punches you in the face for wearing one, that’s your fault.”

“Whenever anyone says that women aren’t funny, I take it as a compliment. Humour is a patriarchal construct.”

This woke (and loving it!)  author would like to apologize if they unintentionally upheld the patriarchal construct by causing any reader to laugh.

A Tutorial on “Wokeness” for Old White Men (2)


How “woke” is our guru…this woke! “Men who are attracted to women clearly have feminine tastes and are therefore probably gay.” AND “It is absolutely essential that we believe Jussie Smollett. If we don’t, other people who haven’t been attacked might not have the courage to come forward.”

Titania McGrath: Our Woke Guru

Mcgrath-Side-1We old, white, unwoke men need a reliably woke guru to lead us into 21st century wisdom. The problem is that we are so stuck in ancient 20th century superstition that it’s almost impossible to wake up to all the new truth that’s been generated while we were slumbering.
I’m therefore so very thankful to have discovered Titania McGrath, who is the most woke Twitter personality of all time! As you can see for yourselves, McGrath has a gift for distilling the deepest truths of wokeness into pithy sayings that fit into things called “Tweets.” As near as I can tell “Tweets” are the 21st century equivalent of Homer’s Odyssey, Shakespeare’s Hamlet, the King James Bible. and Solzhenitsyn’s The Gulag Archipelago, Yes, you have to string lots of them together, but when done properly what emerges is each Tweeter’s truth disclosed in beauty and wisdom.  In fact, if Twitter would automatically add chapter and verse to each Tweet then every Tweeter could build their own personal Bible!  “My truth” in Tweet Scripture!
I simply didn’t realize that in the 21st century diversity means conformity, heterosexuality is evil (and unnecessary for humanity’s future!) and a man can rape a woman he’s never met!

Mcgrath-Side-2Once the easy concepts are understood the deeper truths of wokeness become a snap to grasp. For example, you can be simultaneously superior and oppressed without feeling any sense of nagging logical contradiction! I’ve also struggled for decades trying to understand why Socialism isn’t rejected by the supposedly educated only to finally have it beautifully explained by Titania!
What a wonderful, freeing feeling to realize that you no longer are tied down by “facts” and “logic” when deciding what’s good and true! In fact, it’s not just unnecessary, it’s absolutely evil to be bound by “facts” and “logic.”
By this transformational paradigm we can cease being old white men and start identifying as something else that’s cool, I mean woke…sorry for the brief slip.
Now that we have achieved wokeness it’s critical to understand that it’s a big job keeping up with the fast-evolving nature of this mental state. For example, what was “woke” yesterday might be “problematical” today and “pure evil” tomorrow. Therefore you’ll need to exercise those mental gymnastic muscles regularly. One good way to do this is by calling out the less woke among us. Following are Twitter engagements by our master guru that show how it’s done. Enjoy!

McGrath-Wide-1Once you’ve tied their pathetic evil arguments to Nazi Germany or Hitler they’re finished!

McGrath-Wide-2If words can mean anything you please then defeat is impossible!


See how fast moving is the woke world!  What delivered plenty and comfort in the 20th century is now nonsense.

By the way, it turns out that the McGrath character isn’t necessarily what she seems on the surface. But I, the new woke person, will use all that she’s taught me to turn apparent (by logic that is) defeat into glorious woke victory!